Every change made to this specification instrument since it was started — 57 entries across 14 days. Select a date to read what landed that day. This page is project furniture: it sits outside the 1280×720 canvas and is not part of the Power BI specification.
Reviewer questions, info icons, non-colour cues and code identities
17:40Report presentation
Scope
Review-mode questions for reviewers, an info panel per visual worded from the specification pack, counts beside stacked bars, legends that do not rely on colour, and stable visual codes. Status: Proposed. No figure changes.
What changed
Fourteen visuals carry a muted 'Question for you:' line in their review footer; it is hidden with review mode off.
Visuals with pack wording show an info icon opening 'Shows:' and 'Measured as:'. Visuals with no pack wording have no icon.
3.1 and 2.3 print the count per stage group beside each bar. 1.7 has a legend in stack order. P.4's legend shows marker and line style.
'Planned and actual days by stage' is now C.7; C.5 is retired. Route type by i-Hub stays P.5; the Project list stays L.
The Request funnel banner carries the new proposal text. Coverage lines say 'not counted' instead of 'excluded'.
Where
Every report page (info icons)
/overview (1.2–1.5, 1.7)
/people (2.3)
/volume (3.1, 3.3)
/blockers (4.2–4.4)
/capacity (5.5, 5.6)
/cycle-time (C.7)
/request-funnel (banner, P.2, P.4)
/project-list
How to test
With review mode on, open each page and check the questions and info panels, including at the right and bottom edges.
Confirm the unfiltered page 1 readings remain 25, 73.8%, 62.2%, 211, 19 days and 84.7%.
Review layout: growing frames and final list and bar spacing fixes
16:54Report presentation
Scope
Records the preceding review-layout round and its four follow-ups. Status: Proposed. No model, clearance or figure changes.
What changed
Review frames grow around title, visual, footnote and review footer; review off retains the 1280×720 canvas. Narrow-window fitting, full titles, table headers, grid rows, legends and label spacing were adjusted in the preceding round.
C.5 reserves space below its final Actual bar in both modes. 2.1 and D2.5 scroll complete rows beneath fixed headers; 2.1 remains the largest object on People.
D2.4 customer names wrap to two lines without changing restricted-customer masking. Project list places L directly beside the title in the shared code style.
Where
Report pages in review mode
/people (2.1)
/person-detail (D2.4, D2.5)
/cycle-time (C.5)
/project-list
How to test
Check the named visuals with review on and off; scroll 2.1 and D2.5 and check whole rows and fixed headers.
Confirm the unfiltered page 1 readings remain 25, 73.8%, 62.2%, 211, 19 days and 84.7%.
Pre-review fixes: no company names in action text, machine rows, allocation and Status rules, test record removed
16:40Report pages
Scope
Five fixes from the 6 Oct report, all Proposed and logged in PROTOTYPE_NOTES.md (DIV-1006-P1 to P5).
What changed
Action and blocker sentences say "Tasked to a customer contact" or "Tasked to a partner contact"; no company name appears in them.
A Resource unavailable row for a machine opens Project detail, never Person detail.
Allocation (1.2, 5.1–5.7, Their allocation on 2.1, the 2.2 matrix) counts all of a person's planned hours; only i-Hub, Person, Team and Project Leader choose who is counted.
Period measures, 1.7, 4.4 and the 1.1–1.6 sparklines ignore Status, and say so.
The QA audit 6 Oct test review record is deleted.
Where
/overview (1.2–1.7, 1.9)
/people (2.1, 2.2)
/capacity (5.1–5.7)
/blockers (4.1, 4.3, 4.4)
/cycle-time (C.1, C.2, C.4)
/request-funnel (P.1–P.4)
/person-detail
/project-detail
How to test
Set Region = Americas on page 1: 1.2 reads 73.8%.
Set i-Hub = UK: 1.2 equals 5.1 (103.2%).
Set Status = Active: 1.3 62.2%, 1.5 19 days, 1.6 84.7%, P.1 81.3%; 1.7 unchanged.
With no filters: 25 · 73.8% · 62.2% · 211 · 19 days · 84.7%.
Times are the order in which work landed, not billed effort. Nothing on this page feeds the semantic model.